

gavbon86: If you go to ComicCon in October, check out - Cute AF gear.May as well release what you have, and then do a part 2

RyanSmithAT: No sense in scrapping work already done if it's good work.For Microsoft's Surface Laptop updates, I was expecting them to roll out new Intel and AMD models. RyanSmithAT: Of course, at this point AMD is doing well enough in mobile that they don't need to be in a marquee MS product the….However for performance it’s no contest the R9 Nano nearly doubles the performance of the R9 285 under this game. Like GTX 980, R9 285 is fairly close to R9 Nano in power consumption. Similarly, the R9 Nano enjoys a 10%+ lead over the power-similar GTX 980, with the lead growing with the resolution.įinally, we haven’t made too many R9 285 (Tonga) comparisons, so let’s throw one of those in. The R9 Nano is well ahead of the GTX 970 Mini, beating it by 35% even at the worse for AMD resolution of 1920x1080. Otherwise to make our usual size and power comparisons, everything is in AMD’s favor. At least within the AMD lineup, the only other thing of note here is the R9 390X, which is never too far away from the R9 Nano (just at substantially more power). Performance relative to the R9 Fury X slips a bit more than in the past, now trailing the fastest Fiji by about 15%, while the card trails the slower R9 Fury by 4% at 2560x1440 and 7% at 3840x2160. With the Talos Principle the R9 Nano is once again looking good.

Coupled with the use of 4x MSAA at Ultra quality, and even a tranquil puzzle game like Talos can make a good case for more powerful video cards. Croteam’s first person puzzle and exploration game The Talos Principle may not involve much action, but the game’s lush environments still put even fast video cards to good use.
